Assessing the Impact of Teacher Design Teams on the Professional Development of Vocational Education Teachers A Focus on Attitudes, Beliefs and Instructional Practices in the Context of an Interdisciplinary Course
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Vocational students in European secondary education face a high dropout rate. Research shows that although general subjects are essential for preparing students for their future lives, increasing the time allocated to these subjects in the curriculum also leads to higher dropout rates (e.g., Hall, 2016; Hermann et al., 2013). The professional development of general subject teachers through active and long-term initiatives can improve their attitudes, beliefs, and instructional practices (Merchie et al., 2016). These changes can enhance vocational students’ engagement and motivation, thereby reducing early school dropout (e.g. Van Houtte & Demanet, 2016). This study explores the influence of Teacher Design Teams (TDTs) on teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, and instructional practices in general subjects for vocational secondary education. Throughout two school years, three TDTs have been investigated in the context of an interdisciplinary course. Data collection involved conducting interviews with nine teachers and collecting the designed curriculum materials. These data were analysed using thematic analysis. The results show that the teachers improved their instructional practices and particularly their digital skills. Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs also developed after the implementation of TDTs. The designed curriculum materials exhibited diversity with varying levels of consistency across the different components.
Article Details
Section
References
Abrams, K.M., Wang, Z., Song, Y.J., Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2014). Data richness trade-offs between face-to-face, online audiovisual, and online text-only focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 80-96.
Ajzen, I., & Dasgupta, N. (2015). Explicit and implicit beliefs, attitudes, and inten-tions. In P., Haggard, & B., Eitam (Eds.). The sense of agency (pp. 115-145). Oxford University Press.
Albashiry, N. M., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2015). Teacher collaborative curriculum design in technical vocational colleges: a strategy for maintaining curriculum con-sistency? The Curriculum Journal, 26(4), 601-624.
Anderson, R. C., Bousselot, T., Katz-Buoincontro, J., & Todd, J. (2021). Generating buoyancy in a sea of uncertainty: Teachers creativity and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 614774.
Avalos, B. (2011) Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher education, 27, 10–20.
Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Ad-vances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139-161.
Binkhorst, F., Handelzalts, A., Poortman, C. L., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2015). Under-standing teacher design teams – A mixed methods approach to developing a descrip-tive framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 213–224.
Binkhorst, F., Poortman, C., McKenney, S., & van Joolingen, W. (2022). Leadership in teacher design teams for professional development: research synthesis and applica-tions for coaches, Irish Educational Studies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2148264
Borman, K. M., Clarke, C., Cotner, B., & Lee, R. (2006). Cross-case analysis. In J., Green, G. Camilli, P. Elmore (Eds.). Handbook of complementary methods in educa-tion research (pp. 123-139). Routledge.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (re-flexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
Cerda-Navarro, A., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2017). Recommendations for confronting vocational education dropout: A literature review. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9(1), 1-23.
Compen, B., & Schelfhout, W. (2020). The role of external and internal team coaches in teacher design teams. A mixed methods study. Education Sciences, 10(263), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10100263
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the Unites States and abroad. National Staff Development Council and The School Redesign Network at Stanford University.
Dellinger, A.B., Bobbett, J.J., Olivier, D.F., & Ellett, C.D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Interna-tional journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.
Geijsel, F.P., Sleegers, P.J., Stoel, R.D., & Krüger, M.L. (2009). The effect of teacher psy-chological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406-427.
Hall, C. (2016). Does more general education reduce the risk of future unemployment? Evidence from an expansion of vocational upper secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 52, 251-271.
Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in Teacher Design Teams. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Van den Akker, J. (2019). Teacher design teams for school-wide curriculum development: Reflections on an early study. Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning, 55-82.
Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General education, vocational edu-cation, and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. NBER Working Paper No. 17504. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hermann, Z., & Horn, D. (2023). The effect of decreased general training on skills and dropout-evidence from a vocational school reform in Hungary. Education Econom-ics, 31(6), 725-734.
Hermann, Z., Horn, D., & Tordai, D. (2019). The Effect of the 2013 vocational education reform on student achievement. In K. Fazekas, M. Csillag, Z. Hermann & Á. Scharle (Eds.), The Hungarian Labor Market (pp. 64–69). Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
Janssens, R. & Willem, L. (2022). Peiling Project Algemene Vakken (PAV) in 3de graad BSO 2021: Eindrapport. KU Leuven, Steunpunt Toetsontwikkeling en Peilingen.
Merchie, E., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). Evaluating teachers’ pro-fessional development initiatives: towards an extended evaluative frame-work. Research papers in education, 33(2), 143-168.
Placklé, I., Könings, K. D., Jacquet, W., Struyven, K., Libotton, A., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Engels, N. (2014). Students’ preferred characteristics of learning environments in vocational secondary education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 107-124.
Placklé, I., Könings, K. D., Struyven, K., Libotton, A., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Engels, N. (2020). Powerful learning environments in secondary vocational education: to-wards a shared understanding. European journal of teacher education, 43(2), 224-242.
Räisänen, A., & Räkköläinen, M. (2009). Social and communicational skills in upper sec-ondary vocational education and training. Online Submission, 6(12), 36-45.
Sierens, S., Verbyst, L., Ysenbaert, J., Roose, I., Cochuyt, J., & Vanderstraeten, W. (2017). Onderzoek naar verklaringen voor de peilingsresultaten Project Algemene Vakken (PAV): Eindrapport [Investigating explanations for survey results Project General Subjects (PAV): Final Report]. Universiteit Gent, Steunpunt Diversiteit & Leren.
Stevens, P. A., & Vermeersch, H. (2010). Streaming in Flemish secondary schools: Ex-ploring teachers’ perceptions of and adaptations to students in different streams. Ox-ford Review of Education, 36(3),267-284.
Valckx, J., Vanderlinde, R., & Devos, G. (2019). Departmental PLCs in secondary schools: The importance of transformational leadership, teacher autonomy, and teach-ers’ self-efficacy. Educational Studies, 46(3), 282-301.
Van Den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum Perspectives: An introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Van Houtte, M., & Demanet, J. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about students, and the inten-tion of students to drop out of secondary education in Flanders. Teaching and Teach-er Education, 54, 117-127.
Van Praag, L., Boone, S., Stevens, P., & Van Houtte, M. (2015). De paradox van het watervalsysteem: wanneer het groeperen van studenten in homogene groepen tot meer heterogeniteit leidt in het beroepsonderwijs [The paradox of the waterfall system: when grouping students into homogeneous groups leads to more heterogeneity in vo-cational education]. SOCIOLOGOS, 36(2), 82–101.
Van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2014). Engaging students: The role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal teacher behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21-32.
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curricu-lum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 121-140.
Voogt, J., Laferriere, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional sci-ence, 43(2), 259-282.
Vossen, T. E., Henze, I., Rippe, R. C. A., Van Driel, J. H., & De Vries, M. J. (2019). Attitudes of secondary school STEM teachers towards supervising research and design activities. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 891-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9840-1