Boundary Objects Supporting Students’ Meaning-making During Work Placement in Norwegian Vocational Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the use of boundary objects in vocational education and training (VET) as an approach to address the challenge of meaning making of VET concepts, often experienced by pupils at school just as ‘definitions’ to be learnt by heart or to be memorized, hence becoming isolated knowledge instead of contextual applicable and meaningful. A problem that is well known in international dual VET education and research. As well it turns the focus on, for instance pupils, to potentially become co-brokers between the boundary of school and workplace, using boundary objects, reified as thematic assignments in and for both learning sites. In the interplay between boundary objects, advisors, students and teachers, affordances can be created helping to construct meaning and motivation in and for the pupils’ VET education.
Article Details
Section
References
Aakernes, N., Andresen, S., Bergene, A. C., Dahlback, J., Høst, H., Johannesen, H. S., Skålholt, A., Tønder, A. H., & Vagle, I. (2022). Evaluering av fagfornyelsen yrkesfag, delrapport 1: Bakgrunn, prosess og implementering på vg1[Evaluation of vocational subject renewal, sub-report 1] (NIFU Rapport 2022:8). Utdanningsdirektoratet. https://skriftserien.oslomet.no/index.php/skriftserien/article/view/771
Aarkrog, V. (2005). Learning in the workplace and the significance of school-based education: A study of learning in a Danish vocational education and training programme. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500056268
Aarkrog, V., & Wahlgren, B. (2022). Sammenhæng mellem teori og praksis i erhvervsuddannelserne [Coherence between theory and practice in vocational education]. Pædagogisk indblik, 18.
Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011a). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011b). Learning at the boundary: An Introduction. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.002
Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5, 153-173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9073-6
Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. (2013). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-013-9517-Z
Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. (2019). The Learning Potential of Boundary Crossing in the Vocational Curriculum. In D. Guile & L. Unwin (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training (pp. 351-371). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Berner, B. (2010). Crossing boundaries and maintaining differences between school and industry: forms of boundary-work in Swedish vocational education. Journal of education and work, 23(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080903461865
Bijlsma, N., Schaap, H., & de Bruijn, E. (2016). Students' meaning-making and sense-making of vocational knowledge in Dutch senior secondary vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68(3), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2016.1213763
Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in higher education, 34(7), 827-843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802706561
Billett, S. (2014). Integrating learning experiences across tertiary education and practice settings: A socio-personal account. Educational research review, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.002
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press.
Bouw, E., Zitter, I., & de Bruijn, E. (2019). Characteristics of learning environments at the boundary between school and work – A literature review. Educational research review, 26, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.12.002
Bouw, E., Zitter, I., & De Bruijn, E. (2020). Designable elements of integrative learning environments at the boundary of school and work: A multiple case study. Learning environments research, 24(3), 487-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09338-7
Bouw, E., Zitter, I., & de Bruijn, E. (2021). Exploring co-construction of learning environments at the boundary of school and work through the lens of vocational practice. Vocations and Learning, 14(3), 559-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09276-2
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Cody, W. K. (1996). Intersubjectivity: Nursing’s contribution to the explication of its postmodern meaning. Nursing Science Quarterly, 8(2), 52-54. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/089431849500800202
Dahlback, J., Olstad, H. B., Sylte, A. L., & Wolden, A.-C. (2018). Utfordringer og muligheter i møtepunktet mellom yrkesfaglærerutdanningen og praksis i videregående skole [Challenges and opportunities in the meeting point between vocational teacher education and upper secondary school practice]. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 8(3), 57-77-57-77. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.188357
Dalland, O. (2020). Metode og oppgaveskriving [Method and thesis writing] (7th ed.). Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS.
Edwards, A. (2005). Let’s get beyond community and practice: the many meanings of learning by participating. Curriculum journal, 16(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517042000336809
Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple Helix Clusters: Boundary Permeability at University—Industry—Government Interfaces as a Regional Innovation Strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 766-779. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1182
Evans, K., Guile, D., Harris, J., & Allan, H. (2010). Putting knowledge to work: A new approach. Nurse Education Today, 30(3), 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.014
Ferm, L., Persson Thunqvist, D., Svensson, L., & Gustavsson, M. (2018). Students' strategies for learning identities as industrial workers in a Swedish upper secondary school VET programme. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1394357
Fuller, A., ., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of education and work, 16(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10135-5
Gessler, M. (2017). The lack of collaboration between companies and schools in the German dual apprenticeship system: Historical background and recent data. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(2), 164-195. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.4.2.4
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Routledge.
Gutierrez, K. (1995). Script, Counterscript, and Underlife in the Classroom: James Brown versus "Brown v. Board of Education.". Harvard educational review, 65(3), 445-471. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, culture and activity, 6(4), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
Helms Jørgensen, C., Järvinen, T., & Lundahl, L. (2019). A Nordic transition regime? Policies for school-to-work transitions in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. European Educational Research Journal, 18(3), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119830037
Hiim, H. (2013). Praksisbasert yrkesutdanning: Hvordan utvikle relevant yrkesutdanning for elever og arbeidsliv? [Practice-based vocational education: How to develop relevant vocational education for students and the labour market]. Gyldendal akademisk.
Johannesen, H. S., Kverneggen, K.-A., & Øgård, M. (2022). Læring på tvers: Hvordan kan yrkesfaglæreren legge til rette for boundary learning for elever i arbeidslivspraksis? [Learning across contexts: How can vocational teachers facilitate boundary learning for students in work-based placements?]. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2212151
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing] (3rd ed.). Gyldendal akademisk.
Köhler, D. P., & Goller, M. (2024). Expertise development at work: A workplace curriculum perspective in the domains of sales representatives and leadership coaches in a German context. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.11.3.2
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Nyen, T., & Tønder, A. H. (2012). Fleksibilitet eller faglighet? En studie av innføringen av faget prosjekt til fordypning i Kunnskapsløftet [Flexibility or Professionalism? A Study of the Introduction of the Subject 'In-Depth Study Project' in the Knowledge Promotion Reform]. https://www.fafo.no/media/com_netsukii/20274.pdf
Olesen, M. (2016). Affordance. In K. B. Jensen & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect243
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2022). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Riis, M., & Brodersen, A. (2021). Designing for boundary crossing and ICT-based boundary objects in dual VET. In N. B. Dohn, J. J. Hansen, S. B. Hansen, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Conceptualizing and innovating education and work with networked learning (pp. 37-51). Springer.
Riis, M., Brodersen, A., & Rasmussen, C. L. (2019). Skitse til en grænsekrydsningsdidaktik i erhvervsuddannelser: Med fokus på muligheder for at skabe samspil og sammenhæng gennem brug af informations- og kommunikationsteknologi [Outline for a Boundary-Crossing Didactics in Vocational Education: Focusing on Opportunities to Create Interaction and Coherence through the Use of Information and Communication Technology]. https://ucviden.kp.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/68107274/IOT_rapport_dec2019.pdf
Schaap, H., Baartman, L., & de Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: A review. Vocations and learning, 5(2), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9069-2
Schaap, H., de Bruijn, E., Van der Schaaf, M. F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Students' personal professional theories in competence-based vocational education: the construction of personal knowledge through internalisation and socialisation. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 61(4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820903230999
Shien, C., & Billett, S. (2024). Examining workplace affordances within work-study programmes for becoming an engineer. Journal of Workplace Learning, 36(8), 692-708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2023-0136
SIKT - Norwegian agency for shared services in education and research. (2025). Retrieved 8.3.2025 from https://sikt.no/en/notification-form-personal-data
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Stenström, M.-L., & Tynjälä, P. (2008). Towards Integration of work and learning: Strategies for connectivity and transformation (1. Aufl. ed.). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8962-6
Stoffels, M., van der Burgt, S. M. E., Bronkhorst, L. H., Daelmans, H. E. M., Peerdeman, S. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2022). Learning in and across communities of practice: health professions education students’ learning from boundary crossing. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(5), 1423-1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10135-5
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 19-38). Pergamon.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1-15). Pergamon.
Tynjälä, P., Beausaert, S., Zitter, I., & Kyndt, E. (2022). Connectivity between education and work. In E. Kyndt, S. Beausaert, & I. Zitter (Eds.), Developing connectivity between education and work (pp. 3-14). Routledge.
University of Agder. (2021). Centre for vocational education and training in working life. Retrieved 9.12.2024 from https://www.uia.no/om-uia/senter-og-nettverk/sya/
Utdir. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). The Core Curriculum. Oslo: Udir Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/formalet-med-opplaringen/
Utdir. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2020a). Sales, Service and Tourism (SRSSR1). Udir Re-trieved from https://www.udir.no/kl06/SRSSR1----
Utdir. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2020b). Vocational Specialisation Udir Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/utdanningslopet/videregaende-opplaring/felles-for-fagopplaringen/yrkesfagleg-fordjuping/yrkesfaglig-fordypning-for-de-yrkesfaglige-utdanningsprogrammene-yff/
VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Available from maxqda.com.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Wesselink, R., & Zitter, I. (2017). Designing competence-based vocational curricula at the school-work boundary. In E. de Bruijn, S. Billett, & J. Onstenk (Eds.), Enhancing teaching and learning in the Dutch vocational education system. Professional and practice-based learning (pp. 175-194). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50734-7_9
Wilkinson, S. (2015). Focus groups. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative pshychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 199-221). Sage.
Øgård, M. (2024). Boundary objects as a starting point for reflective learning in vocational education and training classrooms. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 14(4), 24-49. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2414424
Øgård, M., Hillen, S. A., & Wuttke, E. (2025). Thematic assignments making vocational concepts visible during students’ work placements in Norwegian vocational education. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 17(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-025-00180-w